Page Loader
Summarize
SC to hear petition challenging Sambhal mosque survey today
The mosque's management committee filed the petition

SC to hear petition challenging Sambhal mosque survey today

Nov 29, 2024
10:12 am

What's the story

The Supreme Court will hear a petition challenging a lower court's order for a survey of the Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh. The mosque's management committee filed the petition, seeking an immediate stay on the survey. They argue that this could worsen communal tensions. The dispute has already led to violence with four deaths and numerous injuries during protests against the survey.

Legal contention

Petitioners claim violation of Places of Worship Act

The petitioners claim that the civil court's order was passed in haste and without informing affected parties, including the mosque committee and state government. They argue that such actions violate the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which preserves the status quo of religious structures as of August 15, 1947. This case will be heard by a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna.

Inquiry and controversy

UP Governor forms inquiry commission, political controversy ensues

In light of the unrest, Uttar Pradesh Governor Anandiben Patel has constituted a three-member judicial inquiry commission to probe the stone-pelting incident in Sambhal. The commission will be headed by retired Justice Devendra Kumar Arora of the Allahabad High Court. Meanwhile, opposition members in parliament are demanding action against those responsible for the violence.

Broader context

Sambhal dispute part of larger debate over religious sites

The Sambhal case is one of the many that have sparked a national debate over the status of religious sites and historical claims. Similar disputes have erupted at other sites, such as Varanasi's Gyanvapi Mosque and Mathura's Shree Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah site. These cases have questioned the interpretation and enforcement of laws protecting religious sites' historical character. The outcome of this SC hearing could have far-reaching implications for similar disputes across India.