'How can accused's houses be demolished...': SC questions 'bulldozer action'
What's the story
The Supreme Court on Monday expressed strong disapproval of "bulldozer justice," questioning the rationale behind demolishing a house solely because it belongs to an accused in a criminal case. Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, representing the petitioner, urged the court to issue directives preventing such practices nationwide. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta concurred with this view, stating that immovable property should not be demolished merely due to the owner's involvement in a criminal offense.
Due process
Court emphasizes due process
The bench, comprising Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan, emphasized the importance of due process before any demolition. "First notice, time to answer, time to seek legal remedies, and then demolition," stated Justice Viswanathan. The court clarified that it was not defending illegal construction but insisted on the need for clear guidelines governing such actions.
Case examples
Advocates highlight instances
Senior Advocates Dave and CU Singh, representing the petitioners, highlighted instances of unjustified demolitions in Delhi's Jahangirpuri. "They demolished 50-60 year old homes because son or tenant of the owner is involved. One case is from MP and one from Udaipur," Singh added. The Supreme Court has scheduled a follow-up hearing on the matter for Tuesday. It has invited suggestions from both sides to address this issue effectively.