• India
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Auto
  • Lifestyle
More
Hindi Tamil Telugu
More
In the news
Narendra Modi
Amit Shah
Box Office Collection
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
OTT releases
Hindi Tamil Telugu
User Placeholder

Hi,

Logout

India
Business
World
Politics
Sports
Technology
Entertainment
Auto
Lifestyle
Inspirational
Career
Bengaluru
Delhi
Mumbai

Download Android App

Follow us on
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Home / News / India News / Chief Justice of India comes under RTI Act: Supreme Court
Next Article
Chief Justice of India comes under RTI Act: Supreme Court

Chief Justice of India comes under RTI Act: Supreme Court

By Siddhant Pandey
Nov 13, 2019
03:21 pm

What's the story

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court observed that the office of Chief Justice of India is a public authority and hence falls under the purview of the transparency law, Right to Information Act (RTI).

The apex court pronounced the landmark verdict while hearing petitions challenging the Delhi High Court's decision bringing the office of the CJI under the ambit of the RTI Act.

Here's more.

Details

Nobody wants to remain in the state of darkness: SC

Reportedly, a five-judge bench, headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, passed the judgment saying, "Nobody wants to remain in the state of darkness or keep anybody in the state of darkness."

However, the bench added, "In the name of transparency, you can't destroy the institution."

Justices NV Ramana, DY Chandrachud, Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna also constituted the bench.

You're
16%
through

Twitter Post

Transparency doesn't undermine judicial independency, SC observes

'Transparency doesn’t undermine judicial independency', Supreme Court says while upholding the Delhi High Court judgement which ruled that office of Chief Justice comes under the purview of Right to Information Act (RTI). https://t.co/axAjUFzDRr

— ANI (@ANI) November 13, 2019
You're
33%
through

Case

SC was hearing petitions filed against 2010 Delhi HC order

Earlier on April 4, the SC had reserved its judgment on petitions filed in 2010 challenging the Delhi High Court and the central information commission's (CIC's) orders.

The appeals were filed by the SC Secretary-General and its central public information officer.

To recall, on January 10, 2010, the Delhi HC ruled that CJI comes under the ambit of the RTI law.

You're
50%
through

Information

Delhi HC judgment seen as personal attack against then-CJI

The HC had then said that judicial independence was not a judge's privilege, but a responsibility cast upon him. However, the judgment was viewed as a personal attack against the then-CJI, KG Balakrishnan, who opposed the disclosure of information relating to judges under RTI.

You're
66%
through

History

How did move to bring CJI office under RTI initiate?

The move to bring the CJI office under the transparency law was initiated by RTI activist SC Agrawal.

Agrawal's advocate, Prashant Bhushan, had argued that the apex court should not be judging its own cause, in the first place.

Bhushan had contended that the judiciary shouldn't object to divulging information as they don't exist in a different universe and aren't free from "public scrutiny."

You're
83%
through

Quote

People entitled to know what public authorities are doing: Bhushan

Bhushan had then argued, "This is not the independence from accountability. Independence of the judiciary means it has to be independent of the executive and not independent from the common public. People are entitled to know as to what public authorities are doing."

Done!
Facebook
Whatsapp
Twitter
Linkedin
Related News
Latest
Supreme Court Of India
Chief Justice of India

Latest

Sai Sudharsan signs off with 759 runs in IPL 2025 Sai Sudharsan
MI beat GT in IPL 2025 Eliminator, reach Qualifier 2 Mumbai Indians (MI)
2025 French Open, Jasmine Paolini enters 4th round: Key stats French Open
Rohit Sharma completes 7,000 runs and 300 IPL sixes: Stats Rohit Sharma

Supreme Court Of India

Ayodhya hearing to enter final stage today, Section 144 imposed Ayodhya
After 72 days, postpaid mobile services restored in Kashmir Jammu And Kashmir
Here's how Aadhaar can come handy in emergency situations India
Daily hearings in Ayodhya dispute likely to end tomorrow: CJI Uttar Pradesh

Chief Justice of India

Triple talaq ban: The five-faith bench behind the decision India
CJI Khehar: What will he be remembered for? India
Drama in SC: CJI Misra overturns order on judges' bribery-case India
Why shouldn't women be held guilty of adultery? India
Indian Premier League (IPL) Celebrity Hollywood Bollywood UEFA Champions League Tennis Football Smartphones Cryptocurrency Upcoming Movies Premier League Cricket News Latest automobiles Latest Cars Upcoming Cars Latest Bikes Upcoming Tablets
About Us Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Contact Us Ethical Conduct Grievance Redressal News News Archive Topics Archive Download DevBytes Find Cricket Statistics
Follow us on
Facebook Twitter Linkedin
All rights reserved © NewsBytes 2025